Geometry Proof help! Urgent! ♥

[xoxglossylips]

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k129/xoxglossylips/problemgeometry.png

thats the problem. please help? Ohh and i'm working with like theorems and postulates and stuff if you don't already know that.

[sweet_smile]

ugh,i dont get it:P
what grade are you in?

[SupaStaRrMiley92]

OMG i can't stand proofs ughh. but i think i can help ya with this one.

so heres the proof, how i think it goes:
2. <1 and <2 are supplementary, <5 and <6 are supplementary-linear pair
3. <2 and <5 are congruent, <1 and <6 are congruent-corresponding angles postulate
4. <1 and <5 are supplementary-transitive property

i haven't done a proof with those relationships for a bit, so it might be a little off, but thats as close as i can remember.

[xoxglossylips]

thankss. do you know for the last one <1 = <5 could i use the theorem If 2 angles are supp. to the same angle, then they are congruent?

[xoxglossylips]

ugh,i dont get it:P
what grade are you in?

9th. its geometry =)

[None]

thankss. do you know for the last one <1 = <5 could i use the theorem If 2 angles are supp. to the same angle, then they are congruent?

Yes, thats a good enough reason

[megdolphinlover]

great...do u take geopemtry after algebra 1? cuz im in algebra one..and that looks really hard lol....man idk if i wanna do dat in 8th grade lol...oh well :P

[ALstar]

superstarrmiley92 is definetly good at this stuff. haha, seriously though.
im in honors geometry and i DESPISE proofs...we just had a HUGE test on monday...it was 12 pages! and the whole test was 12 proofs! really really hard..i did okay though, 86%.

[Running_Girl]

Heh. WEIRD.
I'm learning the same thing
:O

[krrristin]

they're a linear pair. and since the transversal goes through both then they are suplementry

Or the corresponding angle to <1 is sup. to <5